IT: Chapter 2 (2019) - Review

Review:

*Originally written September 9th, 2019*

The last time the latter half of the IT book was adapted for the screen it was a bit of a disaster. The 1990 miniseries/TV film starts of very strong, but once it focused on The Losers Club as adults, it loses all its momentum and falls flat in one of the most laughable and poorly executed film endings I can think of. So there was a lot of worry going into this, despite IT being quite an excellent horror film from 2 years ago that massively improved on the 1990 adaptation as it blended horror, comedy and drama in a way that led to surprising success.

Due to the success of the previous film, Chapter 2 was no doubt going to happen. This time however, it is a lot more self-indulgent and excessive. While it certainly improves in some areas of the previous film, it definitely falters and has its problems. It's not a complete mess though, as this concluding chapter of the story between The Losers Club and Pennywise is a mostly successful and satisfying finale to the series.

Picking up 27 years after they defeated Pennywise in the '80s, The Losers Club are reunited in 2016 as Pennywise returns for his annual spree of murder and mayhem as they swore an oath to destroy him if he came back. As they all return to their hometown of Derry, the group slowly get their lost traumatic memories back of their experience as they need to overcome them and put an end to psychotic clown once and for all. 

What concerned me most with this sequel was its run-time. Rarely do horror films go to the lengths of nearly being 3 hours, which is the length of the entire miniseries that told both half of the books. While it certainly helped to have more time to explore The Losers Club as adults, the run-time is definitely excessive and bloated. While it does move at quite a smooth pace, you do start to feel those 170 minutes overall. With a film of this length, it could have committed to exploring the group as adults a lot more, but it really feels like a lot of this is padded out with flashbacks to them as children, which honestly just feels like a series of deleted scenes from the first added in.

The new adult Losers Club all do a great job with their roles. Bill Hader in particular is given the most personality as a grown up Richie, who was gone on to become a successful stand-up comedian. Hader is a actor who has rarely impressed me until he did the HBO show Barry, which is immensely worth seeing, but still, it amazes me he managed to outshine both James McAvoy and Jessica Chastain. Who both give strong performances, but are very much outshined by Hader. 

The strongest out the cast is still easily Bill Skarsgard, who still fully commits to his horrifying role as Pennywise, mixing wonderfully over the top comedy with grotesque acts of evil seamlessly. There's very much a less is more approach with Pennywise this time around as he actually features very little in the film, which I actually preferred. Based on the success of the first film, they easily could have doubled down on Pennywise, but instead they commit to focusing more on the characters of The Losers Club, which is definitely a move that would annoy a few people, but for me, it's what I'd prefer.

While Pennywise and his presence are responsible for pretty much all the horror here, a lot of it is sadly CGI creations which look far too fake to have any kind of impact. While there is far too much CGI over practical work, there is still some monstrous creativity here as things get really, really weird. There are images I did not expect to see from a big budget studio film and I kinda applaud them for that. I don't wanna spoil anything, but you're gonna see some weird shit.

At its core though, the IT series is more about overcoming repressed trauma by tackling it head on, which is something the writing and cast manage to handle quite well. The plight of The Losers Club as they have to come to terms with the horror they had to endure as children is what makes this story interesting to me, not Pennywise going bananas and killing kids, which is fun, don't get me wrong, but seeing this characters change and grow stronger and confident as the film goes on is the appeal for me. 

The actual battle between Pennywise as The Losers Club that ends the story was completely laughable and pathetic in the 1990 version and while this certainly improves on that, it still feels underwhelming. There are moments of weird and graphic imagery in the overstuffed finale, but like I said with a lot of the horror, it really was just a massively overblown mash of unconvincing CGI. I've not actually read the book, so I'm not sure how faithful it was, but they've done this battle with Pennywise twice now in similar ways, so his "True Form" really doesn't seem to be something that translates well on the screen.

Even with the disappointing finale, the actual end of the film really does wrap things up in a satisfying way, leaving everyone in a position that doesn't make me want a Chapter 3 and made me glad I went on this 5 hour journey with these characters I've really learned to like. That said, with Hollywood being the way it is, if Chapter 2 does half as well as the first one, I'm sure they'll wanna see Pennywise return in some form, in spite of the conclusive nature of this film. 


I sound like I complained about this a lot, but in all honesty, I liked it quite a bit. It's flawed for sure and has its problems, but overall it's a satisfying end to this now 5 hour story between The Losers Club and Pennywise and it's a massive improvement on the 1990 adaptation thanks to the strong cast, character work, a now iconic portrayal of Pennywise and enough horrific imagery that while not always convincing, it is at the very least memorable. I feel like a broken record saying this once again this year, but IT Chapter 2 is once again a sequel that never lives up to its predecessors, yet still manages to be something worth watching.  

7/10 Dans

IT: Chapter 2 is out now in cinemas in the UK. With a 4K UHD Steelbook available to pre-order from  HMV
Watch the trailer below:

Follow us:
Twitter: @FigmentReviews
Instagram: @FRFigmentReviews
YouTube: Figment Reviews 
Letterboxd: Dan
Facebook

Angel Has Fallen (2019) - Review

Review:

*Originally written September 1st, 2019*

Now, the Fallen series has possibly been the furthest you can get from high-art when it comes to cinema, but there's just something about this series that keeps me coming back to it. It's possibly the '90s feeling action throwback feeling that I have a soft spot for and the fact Gerard Butler's incredibly named hero "Mike Banning" is one of the most deranged and psychopathic leads I've seen from a film of this genre.

I'm genuinely amazed this franchise has now released its third and final(?) film after starting as one of the two Die Hard in the White House knock-offs of 2013. For what the previous two films have been, they were good fun, tasteless, xenophobic, racist and violent, but it felt like it knew this and ran with it. I sort of appreciate them for that, plus its rare we have these mid-range budgeted, adult action films anymore.

This time around Mike Banning is framed for an assassination attempt on the President (Now replaced by Morgan Freeman as Aaron Eckhart did not return) and must clear his name while trying to find out who really did it. It's such basic level stuff and a story we've seen countless times before. Even the Taken series used its third entry to do this very plot, but with a wife instead of president. Despite this, Angel Has Fallen still makes for a very watchable and moderately entertaining action film.

Gerard Butler attempts to add more depth to a Mike Banning that is very different from the previous two films. I assume they listened to the criticisms and attempted to add humanity to what was a previously one note sociopath. Honestly, this is not the Mike Banning who would torture people for fun and tell foreign terrorists to "Go back to Fuckheadistan". While I appreciate the more vulnerable take on Mike Banning who is feeling his age and his previous adventures are beginning to take a serious toll on his physical and mental health, it's handled about as well as you could expect from a series of this level.

The attempts at humanising Banning are surface level at best as all this is often overlooked in favour of getting to the next action scene or moving the plot forward. Now, I was never expecting some character drama looking at Mike Banning's acceptance of his own mortality, but I was at least expecting something more when they were ditching the tone of the previous films for something a bit more grim. Take Logan as a good example, the third in a trilogy where the previous two films were not so good, but then the third film delivered something much more thoughtful, but at the same time managed to be an incredible action film. That's what I feel Angel is going for, but it doesn't come close.

Despite failing to make something meaningful out of its characters, this is still a fairly brisk and watchable action film. The plot of Banning being framed is outrageously predictable and you'd have to have a very low IQ not to figure out who the real villain is a few minutes in. It's so very formulaic, but Gerard Butler actually manages to carry this, as does some solid action.

Once again changing directors with each film, Ric Roman Waugh actually does a decent job with most of the action. It's not John Wick level stuff, but it gets the job done, The violence feels punchy and brutal while there is minor moments of inspiration within the gun-play with some use of POV. It does lack in comparison to the more memorable stuff in the previous films, there's nothing close to the opening of Olympus with gunship wiping out DC or the motorbike chase from London, but like I said, it's very watchable and competent.

What's more surprising is the subplot involving Nick Nolte as Banning's ex-Vietnam vet survivalist estranged father. Nolte is clearly having a blast playing such a deranged coot of a character who pretty much steals the show with his brief scenes and even gets in on some of the action. The relationship with his father does add just amount of depth to Banning to help figure out how he became the psychotic man he's been portrayed as, but as you expect, that's handled as well as you would expect from this film. There's also a mid-credits scene between the two that is one of the most out of place, insane, unfunny and cringiest things I've seen from a film this year. 

Whether or not this is the end of the adventures of Mike Banning is another question too. The advertisement and trailers did tease this was the end of this franchise, but it lacks a definitive ending. So I can expect a fourth one if this one does as well as the last two. Although in all honesty, I say keep 'em coming. It's probably a good thing, but we really don't get that many films like this anymore. Good bless Mike Banning.


There's very little else to say about Angel Has Fallen, if you're on board with this throwback series, you'll find something to enjoy in the merely acceptable finale to the trilogy, but if not, you will probably hate this as much as the other two, or maybe less, as the horrible parts of the first two are pretty much absent here. It's sad to say, but Angel Has Fallen is another underwhelming franchise film from 2019 that failed to live up to the previous entries, but at the same time is still acceptable entertainment, if entirely forgettable.

6/10 Dans

Angel Has Fallen is out now in cinemas in the UK

Follow us:
Twitter: @FigmentReviews
Instagram: @FRFigmentReviews
YouTube: Figment Reviews 
Letterboxd: Dan
Facebook