Showing posts with label cloverfield. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cloverfield. Show all posts

Tuesday, 13 February 2018

The Cloverfield Paradox (2018) - Film Review


Review:

Netflix surprised everyone at the 2018 Super Bowl, not only did they release a trailer for the untitled Cloverfield film (Now titled 'The Cloverfield Paradox'), but they also made the shocking announcement that the film was released and ready to watch that same day. It's a ballsy move that certainly raises questions and sets an interesting precedent on how films are released, but after watching it, it's easy to see why this was released on Netflix rather than theaters. 

The Cloverfield franchise itself has been a very interesting one. First we had a found-footage monster film that sparked a new age of mystery (I was only 11, but I remember all the hype and excitement of the viral marketing. People guessing what the monster would look like etc), it was the golden age of internet film fandom, back when IMDB had message boards, remember those? That came and went, with rumblings about a sequel which never surfaced until 2016, when a trailer was dropped for 10 Cloverfield Lane, which was releasing only a couple of months after the trailer was shown. 

I was hugely excited for this. I liked the idea of these little anthology horror/thrillers taking place in the same world. Now it's a shame that the series may have just faded into nothingness with this extremely disappointing dud of a sci-fi thriller. Once you look a little closer into the troubled production of Cloverfield Paradox, you start to see why this was released the way it was. It went over budget and Paramount were sure it would flop, so they sold it to Netflix for a small profit and cut their losses there.

On a space station titled 'Cloverfield' a group of bland scientists discover that the Earth has disappeared after an experiment goes wrong, weird shit goes on and things go pretty much how you'd expect. This isn't a problem, I'm fine with formulaic films as long they at least have some character or something to grab you. It's just there's nothing here.

Despite it's $50 million budget, it looks like garbage. This doesn't look like a film, aside from a few visual flourishes, this looks like an expensive TV pilot, and I'm not sure how this happened. I watched the first episode of Netflix's Altered Carbon recently and despite being a TV show, it actually looks more like a film than this does. It feels like some Asylum knock-off of Life (Which was a fairly generic sci-fi horror in itself, but it at least had fun with it).


The cast are nothing, vastly underwritten objects that spout poorly written exposition in ways that get more and more laughable. Chris O'Dowd does bring some fun to proceedings, but his character gets more irritating once you realise he is nothing more than comic relief and absolutely nothing beneath the surface. I'm a week removed from this film and I'm failing to recall anyone's name. 

Things happen in this film without any real explanation. We're told "Parallel Universes are colliding", but this doesn't explain why so much happens, including some outrageous coincidences. Some cool stuff does happen though, the stuff with the hand was morbidly funny in an odd way and last shot of the film is pretty easy to figure out early on, but it still brings back a familiar face and gets me a bit excited for the future of the series, despite the problems this film has caused.

While most of the events take place on the space station, a side-plot (That goes absolutely nowhere) takes place on Earth during what we assume is the first Cloverfield. I was all for this, but the story line is aimless, pointless and leads to nothing. Making me wonder why an extra 20 minutes was added to this mess in the first place. I know this had reshoots to tie it in to the Cloverfield brand, so I assume this was shoehorned in to pay some fan service. It doesn't work.

One of the biggest problems here is the attempts to over explain things for the franchise. They couldn't just let them happen with no explanation, they had to come up with some lame reasons why the events of the first and second films happened, who cares? A giant monster attacks a city, we don't need a franchise to explain why. 


I saw it the day it was announced, which is the most interesting thing about this mess. We're only in the third Cloverfield film and it seems like they've already ruined it in this bland, poorly written mess. Here's hoping 'Overlord' is better than this.

4/10 Dans

The Cloverfield Project is streaming now on Netflix UK
Watch the trailer below:

Follow us:
Twitter: @FigmentReviews and @ArronRoke91
Instagram: @thesurprisingadventuresofdanb and @ArronRoke
YouTube: Figment Reviews 
Letterboxd: Dan and Arron

Facebook

Wednesday, 28 June 2017

10 Cloverfield Lane (2016) - Film Review

Review:

*Originally written May 8th, 2016*

"I think we're alone now"

Despite the disappointment of missing this at the cinema, this was so worth the wait. I already knew this was a relation to Cloverfield in name only, and in all honesty, is much better for it. It still takes place in the same universe as the first film (I assume), but this tells a completely different story in a different location with a new threat and new characters.

After a girl is wiped of the road, she wakes up in a bunker being held captive by a crazed fanatic played by John Goodman claiming the world has ended after a chemical attack and that his shelter is the only safe place left.

It's taut and effective. Smaller and tense than its predecessor. First time director Dan Trachtenberg keeps an unsettling and tense atmosphere surrounded by mystery throughout. It was interesting to see these characters slowly become more and more concerned about their situation as John Goodman's character becomes more unstable.


Speaking of John Goodman, the man is a terrifying monster here. He's both sympathetic, yet imposing and scary when he needs to be. He arguably starts off as a man seemingly trying to do the right thing, but slowly becomes more unhinged as it goes on and you learn more about him.

The two other leads were great too. Mary Elizabeth Winstead is an actress I've always liked, but has never really been given the chance to shine and has been put in minor supporting roles in two terrible Die Hard films, so it was great to see her as smart and likeable lead you root for. Then John Gallagher Jr. was fine in his role, he was serviceable, but easily the least interesting of the leads.

The whole thing builds to an insane, genre-busting final act that gets a little too silly for my liking, but doesn't take away from the incredibly tense and entertaining 80 minutes that came before it. I will admit I did have the ending spoiled for me before seeing it, so I knew what was going to happen, but it still didn't work for me. I kind of wish it just stuck to the one location setting and we didn't know what was happening outside the bunker.


I do like what they're doing with the Cloverfield franchise though. This was a risky move that payed off and is a far more involving and interesting film than the original. I cannot wait to see what they do next with this anthology series and see how it all ties together (which is the plan)

10 Cloverfield Lane is a pleasant surprise. A tense, claustrophobic thriller with a powerhouse performance from Goodman, a likeable lead and shrouded in mystery. It's just a shame it goes a bit off the rails with the ending.

8/10 Dans

10 Cloverfield Lane is out now on Blu-ray and DVD in the UK
Watch the trailer below:

Follow us:
Twitter: @FigmentReviews, @DanBremner96 and @ArronRoke91
Instagram: @DanBremner96 and @ArronRoke
YouTube: Figment Reviews
Letterboxd: Dan and Arron 

Facebook
 

  

Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order (2019) - PS4 Review

Review: *Originally written November 19th, 2019* There's no denying that EA has had a bad run with the Star Wars franchise since i...